![]() ![]() Crack Mac Softwares. Any. Trans 6. 0. 1 License Code With Crack Free Download. Any. Trans 6. 0. 0 License Code is an emphasized and complete i. OS Content Manager. It gives both control and freedom over all users’ i. OS data and files, including music, videos, photos, messages, books, Safari history, voice memo, no matter the content is on an i. Phone, or i. Tunes backup or even … [Read more..]. Wise Care 365 Pro is the ultimate utility software for your computer and this software is a complete solution of taking total care of your PC performance. IObit Uninstaller 7 is the perfect solution for uninstalling unwanted programs, bundleware, browser plugins and Windows Apps. It removes malicious browser plugins. GraphiSoft ArchiCAD 20 Crack is world's fastest and most enhanced 3D architectural software on the market with valuable add-ons and Serial Keys.
0 Comments
![]() PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS - Alcohol- Use Disorders - National Library of Medicine. Review overview. The literature search identified six studies that assessed the cost effectiveness of psychological interventions for the treatment of alcohol dependence or harmful alcohol use (Alwyn et al., 2. Fals- Stewart et al., 2. Holder et al., 2. Mortimer & Segal 2. Slattery et al., 2. UKATT Research Team, 2. ![]() Full references, characteristics and results of all studies included in the economic review are presented in the form of evidence tables in Appendix 1. The study by Alwyn and colleagues (2. The home detoxification programme comprised five home visits of 3. CPNs. The study population consisted of 9. NEWS 0809 <P>Preface.- Making it to the synapse. Measles virus spread in and among neurons.- Modeling subacute sclerosing panencephalitis in a transgenic mouse system. UK who fulfilled inclusion criteria for home detoxification. A number of outcome measures were assessed in the study including: number of DDD; total number of days abstinent; total number of alcohol units consumed; abstinence or moderate drinking; and severity of dependence. PubMed Health. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). · The National Acupuncture Detoxification Association (NADA)-standardized 3- to 5-point ear acupuncture protocol, born of a community-minded response to. The NNT to produce one extra non- drinker was also calculated. An NHS perspective was used for the economic analysis. Resource- use data included inpatient days, outpatient care (including CPN visits) and medications. Because clinical outcomes were left disaggregated and no summary outcome measure was used in the economic analysis, a cost- consequences analysis was used. The authors made no formal attempt to compare the total costs of a psychological intervention in addition to home detoxification with home detoxification alone. Electro Acupuncture A Practical Manual And Resource DownloaderInstead the authors calculated total costs per person of inpatient treatment (£2,1. Therefore, the extra cost of a psychological intervention programme was substantially lower than the cost of inpatient treatment and outpatient visits. In terms of clinical outcomes, significantly better results were observed in people treated with home detoxification plus a psychological intervention. The authors concluded that, due to the low NNT to obtain an extra non- drinker, it is likely that the implementation of a psychological intervention would lead to cost savings to the NHS. Although the results of this study are highly relevant to the UK context, there are a number of methodological limitations. Firstly, no attempt was made to combine costs and effectiveness with an array of effectiveness measures used in the study. The measures of effectiveness used are of limited usefulness to policy makers when assessing the comparative cost effectiveness of healthcare interventions. The clinical- effectiveness study compared psychological intervention and home detoxification with home detoxification alone. However, in the cost- analysis, home detoxification was compared with other detoxification programmes, such as inpatient and outpatient programmes. Therefore, the study did not directly assess the cost- effectiveness of adding psychological intervention to home detoxification. The study by Fals- Stewart and colleagues (2. BRT) compared with standard BCT (S- BCT), individual- based treatment (IBT) and PACT for alcohol- dependent males and their non- substance- misusing female partners. BRT, IBT and PACT consisted of 1. S- BCT consisted of 2. A societal perspective was taken for the analysis with costs including those associated with the four treatment programmes and costs of participants' and their partners' travel time. The primary measure of effectiveness for the economic analysis was the change in percentage days of heavy drinking from baseline to 1. Rather than calculating ICERs, the authors calculated mean change in PDHD over 1. US$1. 00 units), with higher ratios indicating greater cost effectiveness. Overall, BRT had the highest mean ratio (4. The findings of this study have limited applicability to this guideline as it is based within the US health system, outcomes were not expressed as QALYs and a societal perspective was taken for the cost analysis (both outside the NICE reference case). Furthermore, no formal attempt at an incremental analysis, in terms of differences in costs and outcomes, was attempted by the authors. The study by Holder and colleagues (2. CBT, 4- session MET and 1. TSF) over 3 years' follow- up. The study participants were a sample (6. US Project MATCH study (Project MATCH Research Group, 1. The perspective of the cost analysis was from US healthcare providers. Resource- use data included the three treatments and any subsequent inpatient or outpatient care over 3 years. The authors calculated mean monthly costs for the three treatments rather than total costs over 3 years and no incremental or statistical analyses were presented. Overall, mean monthly costs were US$1. CBT, US$1. 76 for MET and US$2. TSF, suggesting that MET had the largest potential healthcare savings over 3 years. The major limitations of this analysis were the lack of descriptive detail on the resource use and costs considered whilst no incremental analysis was presented. The findings have limited applicability to this guideline as it was based on the US healthcare system and no formal attempt was made by the authors to combine cost and clinical- outcomes data, which were collected in the study and reported elsewhere (Project MATCH Research Group, 1. The study by Mortimer and Segal (2. A lifetime horizon was used for all of the analyses considered. The first analysis compared three brief motivational interventions with different levels of intensity (simple was 5 minutes, brief was 2. Australian healthcare setting. The outcome measure used in the analysis was QALYs calculated from disability weights derived from a single published source (Stouthard et al., 1. Clinical effectiveness data were taken from published studies evaluating interventions that were targeting heavy drinkers at lower severity levels. These data were used to estimate how patients would progress between specific drinking states (problem, moderate or dependent) within the model. The authors did not specify the resource use and cost components included in the model, although a health service perspective was adopted for the analysis. The results of the analysis suggested that brief motivational interventions were cost effective compared with no active treatment. The ICERs ranged from under AUS$8. QALY for the simple intervention to under AUS$2. QALY for the extended intervention. The second analysis compared psychotherapies for mild to moderate alcohol dependence. The comparators were moderation- oriented cue exposure (MOCE) versus BSCT and MET or non- directive reflective listening versus no further counselling after initial assessment, also within the Australian healthcare setting. Again, the outcome measure used in the analysis was the QALY calculated from disability weights derived from a single published source (Stouthard et al., 1. Clinical effectiveness data were taken from published studies evaluating interventions for mild to severe dependence. These data were used to estimate how patients would progress between specific drinking states (problem, moderate or dependent) within the model. No resource use and cost components were specified within the article. The results of the analysis suggested that MOCE was cost effective in comparison with BSCT, resulting in an ICER of AUS$2,1. QALY. Non- directive reflective listening was dominated by no further counselling after initial assessment, resulting in higher costs but lower QALYs. However, the results of the analysis suggested that MET was cost effective compared with no further counselling after initial assessment, resulting in an ICER of AUS$3. QALY. There are several limitations of the results of the study by Mortimer and Segal (2. UK- based recommendations. In the second analysis of interventions for mild to moderate alcohol dependence, a common baseline comparator was not used in the analyses of MOCE, MET and non- directive reflective listening, limiting their comparability in terms of cost effectiveness. Ideally, indirect comparisons of the three interventions would have provided additional information about their relative effectiveness. Little explanation was given in the article as to how the clinical effectiveness data, which were taken from various sources, were used to inform the health states used in the economic models. The article did not specify the resource use and costs that were included in the analyses although a health perspective was used. Event Management. Visual Methods for Event Studies. Special Issue call for papers for publication in Event Management. Editors: Tomas Pernecky, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. Tijana Rakić, University of Brighton, UKKey dates and submission information: Abstract submission: 1. July, 2. 01. 7Submission of full papers: 3. November, 2. 01. 7Review notification: January, 2. Projected publication: December, 2. Following the early articulation of event studies (Getz, 2. Pernecky, 2. 01. 6), it is timely to engage with, and promote, a range of methodological approaches to deepen our understanding of events phenomena. Visual methods not only enable researchers to produce knowledge in innovative ways, they can be seen as a liberating and emancipatory force, whereby researchers, participants and communities have access to knowledge and expressions beyond the strictures of traditional methods. Despite the fact that visual methods are well established in the wider humanities and social sciences (e. Banks & Zeitlyn, 2. Hughes, 2. 01. 2; Margolis & Zunjarwad, 2. Pink, 2. 01. 2, 2. Rose, 2. 01. 6), the multi- , inter- , and post- disciplinary field of events studies lags behind these developments. Building on the momentum visual methods gained in the related domain of tourism research (e. Rakić & Chambers, 2. A preliminary selection of suggested areas includes, but is not limited to, the following: Philosophies of visual methodologies in events; Conceptualisations of the visual in events: collecting, creating and analysing different types of visuals in event studies; Research quality criteria in visual event studies; Studying the (visual and textual) representations of places, cultures and identities in events; Understanding and researching indigenous events, including the rich traditions of story- telling, drawing, painting, performing, and singing though a reliance on visual methods; Accessing emotions through a reliance on the visual in event studies; Events and the role of the visual in worldmaking/placemaking; Visual methods, events and political theory; Visual analysis of event spaces; The importance of the visual in critical event design and programming; For full consideration of your proposed manuscript in this special issue, please submit a 2. July, 2. 01. 7 via email to Tomas Pernecky (. This e- mail address is being protected from spambots. You need Java. Script enabled to view it. Tijana. Rakic (. This e- mail address is being protected from spambots. You need Java. Script enabled to view it. Invited papers will be due by 3. November, 2. 01. 7. Aims & Scope. Event Management, an International Journal, has been meeting the research, educational, and analytic needs of the rapidly growing profession focused on global events for more than 2. This field has developed and evolved in size and impact globally to become a major business with numerous dedicated facilities and a large scale generator of tourism. The field encompasses meetings, conventions, festivals, expositions, sport, and other special events. Event management is also of considerable importance to government agencies and not for profit organizations in pursuit of a variety of goals, including fundraising, the fostering of causes, and community development. Event Management aims to continue to be the leading source of research articles, reports and analysis related to all forms of event management. This journal publishes refereed manuscripts, commentaries, research notes, case studies, invited articles, book reviews, and documentation of news and trends. It also invites topical opinion pieces, profiles of organizations, and management case studies. Event Management is governed by an international editorial board consisting of experts in event management, tourism, business, sport, and related fields. This board conducts most of the manuscript reviews and plays a large role in setting the standards for research and publication in the field. The Editor- in- Chief receives and processes all manuscripts, and, from time to time, will modify the editorial board ensuring a continuous improvement in quality. The journal, sold by annual subscription, is published quarterly in print and on- line. Editors and the publisher are not responsible for the views expressed by contributing authors. Event Management invites submissions of research articles and notes, news, opinion pieces, organizational profiles management case studies, and proposals to review books or other material. Submission of Manuscripts: To expedite the submission and review process authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts electronically via email to Kenneth Backman (. This e- mail address is being protected from spambots. You need Java. Script enabled to view it. The text portion of the manuscript as well as the figures and tables should be sent as an attached Microsoft Word file. If the paper is accepted for publication, the author(s) must provide two hard copies of the manuscript, two high- quality copies of all artwork, and a computer disk or a CD with the text portion in Microsoft Word. See Final Accepted Manuscript/Disk below.]Authors unable to submit electronically should mail three complete copies (including all figures and tables) to Kenneth Backman, Clemson University, PRTM Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC 2. USA. Phone: 8. 64- 6. E- mail. This e- mail address is being protected from spambots. You need Java. Script enabled to view it. All manuscripts must be typed using double spacing (including references), and should be checked carefully prior to submission. Manuscripts must contain original material and must not have been published previously. Material accepted for publication may not be published elsewhere without the consent of the publisher. All rights and permissions must be obtained by the contributor(s) and should be sent upon acceptance of manuscripts for publication. A cover page should contain the title of the manuscript, all author names and their corresponding affiliations, because manuscripts are sent out for blind review. Identify the corresponding author and provide complete mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, and e- mail address. Provide summer address and email if appropriate.)The manuscript text should contain the manuscript title, abstract and key words for indexing purposes, main body (consisting of an Introduction, Literature Review, Method, Results, Analysis, and Discussion, and Conclusions, as appropriate), acknowledgments, references, figure legends, and tables. Figures should appear at the end or in a separate file. Do not incorporate figures and tables within the body of the text. References should be placed at the end of the text beginning on a separate page, arranged in alphabetical order. Follow APA guidelines set forth in their Publication Manual (6th edition) for text and reference list citations, per the examples. Note: always provide citation page number(s) for quoted material.]Text citations: (Gunn, 1. Fesenmaier et al., 1. Mazanec, 1. 99. 2, 1. Uysal & Gitelson, 1. Crompton, 1. 97. 9, p. Journal citation: Crouch, I. G. (1. 99. 4). The study of international tourism demand: A review of findings. Journal of Travel Research, 3. Book citation: Witt, E. S., & Witt, C. A. (1. 99. 2). Modeling and forecasting in tourism. London: Academic Press. Chapter/pages in edited book: Frechtling, C. D. (1. 99. 4). Assessing the impacts of travel and tourism: Measuring economic benefits. In J. R. Brent Ritchie & C. R. Goeldner (Eds.), Travel, tourism, and hospitality research (2nd ed., pp. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Please note that citations such as "personal communication" should be cited parenthetically in the text only. Do not include in the reference list. Figures: All figures should be prepared in . Do not incorporate figures within the text of the manuscript. Figures should be prepared without color unless the figure is to be printed in color. Note there is a charge for printing figures in color). Labeling and figure detail must be large enough to be legible after reduction to fit page parameters. Each figure must be cited in the text and legends for all illustrations should be included on a separate page. Do not incorporate figure legends as part of the figure and figure file. Place figure legend text at the end of the manuscript file following the reference section. Photographs should be presented in a . All figures should be cited in the text. Tables: Table material should not duplicate the text. Dm. C Devil May Cry: The Chronicles of Vergil HC - Westfield Comics. ![]() A new year at the Duel Academy has begun and the Tag Duel Tournament is the year's most anticipated event. Champion duelists from all around the world have accepted. Start reading The Grimm Chronicles, Vol. 1 on your Kindle in under a minute. Vol. 1 has the first three stories from the 12 that will ultimately make up the. Jsa Liberty Files: The Whistling Skull #5 Justice League #18. Dmc Devil May Cry Vergil Chronicles #1 Doctor Who Vol 3 #9 Fantastic Four #8 Fearless Defenders #4. There's something to say about trying to hold onto basic decency in a den full of snakes. It kills you or drives you insane. Or both. Why else would he get himself. Dc adventures of superman #2. dmc devil may cry vergil chronicles #2. hoax hunters case files #1. Parallels Desktop for Mac - Wikipedia. Parallels Desktop for Mac. Developer(s)Parallels. Stable release. 13. August 2. 2, 2. 01. Operating systemmac. ![]() ![]() Parallels Desktop for Mac, by Parallels, is software providing hardware virtualization for Macintosh computers with Intel processors. VMware Workstation Pro and VMware Workstation Player are the industry standard for running multiple operating systems as virtual machines on a single PC. Thousands of.Okay, let’s talk about a very serious topic: bath mats. Is there a right and wrong way to use them? OSPlatform. Apple–Intel architecture. Available in. English, Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, German, Russian, French, Spanish, Italian, Japanese, Brazilian Portuguese, Korean, Polish, Czech. Type. Hypervisor. License. Proprietary. ![]() Websitewww. parallels. Parallels Desktop for Mac, by Parallels, is software providing hardware virtualization for Macintosh computers with Intel processors. Overview[edit]Parallels, Inc. Historical[edit]Released on June 1. Macintosh computers utilizing the Apple–Intel architecture (earlier software products ran PC software in an emulated environment). Its name initially was 'Parallels Workstation for Mac OS X', which was consistent with the company's corresponding Linux and Windows products. This name was not well received within the Mac community, where some felt that the name, particularly the term “workstation,” evoked the aesthetics of a Windows product. Parallels agreed: “Since we've got a great Mac product, we should make it look and sound like a Mac product..”, it was therefore renamed ‘Parallels Desktop for Mac’.[1]On January 1. Parallels Desktop 3. Mac was awarded “Best in Show” at Mac. World 2. 00. 7.[2]Technical[edit]Parallels Desktop for Mac is a hardware emulation virtualization software, using hypervisor technology that works by mapping the host computer’s hardware resources directly to the virtual machine’s resources. Each virtual machine thus operates identically to a standalone computer, with virtually all the resources of a physical computer.[3] Because all guest virtual machines use the same hardware drivers irrespective of the actual hardware on the host computer, virtual machine instances are highly portable between computers. For example, a running virtual machine can be stopped, copied to another physical computer, and restarted. Parallels Desktop for Mac is able to virtualize a full set of standard PC hardware, including[4]A virtualized CPU of the same type as the host's physical processor,ACPI compliance system,A generic motherboard compatible with the Intel i. Up to 6. 4 GB of RAM for guest virtual machines,Up to 2 GB of video RAM (VRAM),VGA and SVGAvideo adapter with VESA 3. Open. GL and Direct. X 1. 0. 1 acceleration,A 1. MB floppy drive, which can be mapped to a physical drive or to an image file,Up to four IDE devices. This includes virtual hard drives ranging in size from 2. MB to 2 TB each and CD/DVD- ROM drives. Virtual CD/DVD- ROM drives can be mapped to either physical drives or ISO image files. DVD/CD- ROM “pass- through” access,Up to four serial ports that can be mapped to a pipe or to an output file,Up to three bi- directional parallel ports, each of which can be mapped to a real port, to a real printer, or to an output file,An Ethernet virtual network card compatible with Realtek RTL8. AS), capable of up to 1. Up to eight USB 2. USB 1. 1 devices,An AC'9. A 1. 04- key Windows enhanced keyboard and a PS/2 wheel mouse. Version 2. 5[edit]The first official release of version 2. February 2. 7, 2. Version 2. 5 brought support for USB 2. USB devices supported at native speed, including support for built in i. Sight USB web- cams. The amount of video RAM allocated to the guest OS was made adjustable, up to 3. MB. Full featured CD/DVD drives arrived in this version, which allowed the user to burn disks directly in the virtual environment, and play any copy- protected CD or DVD as one would in Mac OS X. In addition, a shared clipboard and drag- drop support between Mac OS X and the guest OS was implemented. This version brought the ability for users with a Windows XP installation to upgrade to Windows Vista from within the VM environment.[5] A new feature known as Coherence was added, which removed the Windows chrome, desktop, and the virtualization frames to create a more seamless desktop environment between Windows and Mac OS X applications. This version also allowed users to boot their existing Boot Camp Windows XP partitions, which eliminated the need to have multiple Windows installations on their Mac. A tool called Parallels Transporter was included to allow users to migrate their Windows PC, or existing VMware or Virtual PC VMs to Parallels Desktop for Mac. Netsys lawsuit[edit]In 2. German company Netsys Gmb. H sued Parallels' German distributor Avanquest for copyright violation, claiming that Parallels Desktop and Parallels Workstation are directly based on a line of products called “two. OStwo” that Parallels developed on paid commission for Netsys, of which it says, Netsys has been assigned all copyrights. Additionally, the lawsuit claimed that Parallels Desktop 2. OStwo” showed that the two software products are run by essentially the same functional core.[6] When Netsys lost its initial urgency proceeding, it filed a new suit, in which it requested a temporary injunction from the Landgericht district court of Berlin.[7]Version 3. On June 7, 2. 00. Desktop 3. 0. Version 3. Support for Direct. X 8. 1 and Open. GL[8] was added, allowing Mac users to play some Windows games without the need to boot into Windows with Boot Camp.[9] A new feature called Smart. Select offers cross OS file and application integration by allowing the user to open Windows files with Mac OS X programs and vice versa. Parallels Explorer was introduced, which allows the user to browse their Windows system files in Mac OS X without actually launching Windows. A new snapshot feature was included, allowing one to restore their virtual machine environment to a previous state in case of issues. Further, Parallels added a security manager to limit the amount of interaction between the Windows and Mac OS X installations. This version included a long awaited complete “Parallels tools'” driver suite for Linux guest operating systems. Therefore, integration between Mac OS X and Linux guest- OS's has been greatly improved.[1. Despite the addition of numerous new features, tools and added functionality, the first iteration of Desktop for Mac 3. Parallels had planned for it. A Parallels, Inc. Mac. World in January 2. SMP, some SCSI support, a more Mac- like feel, as well as a more sophisticated coherence mode, dubbed Coherence 2. While accelerated graphics have materialised, Coherence, as well as the overall look and feel of Parallels Desktop for Mac has only changed slightly. Also, SCSI support has not been implemented.[1. It is currently unknown if these features have been abandoned altogether, or if they will show up in a later build of version 3. Build 4. 56. 0, released on July 1. Feature update[edit]. Parallels Coherence in ExposéBuild 5. September 1. 1, 2. The release focused on updates to Coherence, with support for Exposé, window shadows, transparent windows, and the ability to overlap several Windows and Mac windows. Further, Parallels' Image Tool was updated to allow one to change their virtual hard disk format between plain and expanding. Parallels Explorer was updated to allow for one to automatically mount an offline VM hard drive to the Mac desktop. Some new features added are i. Phone support in Windows, allowing i. Tunes in Windows to sync with it.[1. Users can now mirror desktops or other folders. Further, Mac drives can now be mapped by Windows and sound devices can now be changed ‘on the fly’. Up to 2 GB of RAM can be allocated to a virtual machine, with a total of 4 GB of RAM available.[1. Parallels Desktop for Mac Build 5. Parallels Tools for Linux in the latest Linux distributions (including Ubuntu 8). It also added support for running 3. D graphics in Windows virtual machines on Mac OS X Leopard 1. Use of code from the Wine project[edit]According to Parallels' Licensing page, Desktop for Mac version 3. Direct. 3D code that was originally developed by the Wineopen source project.[1. Wine software is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License, which required Parallels to release the source code. Parallels released the modified source code on July 2, 2. A Parallels spokesman explained the reasons for the delay in a message on the official company blog.[1. Version 4. 0[edit]Version 4. November 1. 1, 2. GUI, adds some new features, enhances its performance by up to 5. Version 4. 0 is the first version of Parallels Desktop that supports both 3. Parallels Desktop 4. Mac’s 3. D support includes Direct. X 9. 0, Direct. X Pixel Shader 2. Open. GL 2. 0[2. 3] as well as 2. Linux distribution - Wikipedia. A Linux distribution (often abbreviated as distro) is an operating system made from a software collection, which is based upon the Linux kernel and, often, a package management system. Linux users usually obtain their operating system by downloading one of the Linux distributions, which are available for a wide variety of systems ranging from embedded devices (for example, Open. Wrt) and personal computers (for example, Linux Mint) to powerful supercomputers (for example, Rocks Cluster Distribution). A typical Linux distribution comprises a Linux kernel, GNU tools and libraries, additional software, documentation, a window system (the most common being the X Window System), a window manager, and a desktop environment. Most of the included software is free and open- source software made available both as compiled binaries and in source code form, allowing modifications to the original software. Usually, Linux distributions optionally include some proprietary software that may not be available in source code form, such as binary blobs required for some device drivers.[1] A Linux distribution may also be described as a particular assortment of application and utility software (various GNU tools and libraries, for example), packaged together with the Linux kernel in such a way that its capabilities meet the needs of many users.[2] The software is usually adapted to the distribution and then packaged into software packages by the distribution's maintainers. The software packages are available online in so- called repositories, which are storage locations usually distributed around the world.[3][4] Beside glue components, such as the distribution installers (for example, Debian- Installer and Anaconda) or the package management systems, there are only very few packages that are originally written from the ground up by the maintainers of a Linux distribution. Almost six hundred Linux distributions exist, with close to five hundred out of those in active development.[5] Because of the huge availability of software, distributions have taken a wide variety of forms, including those suitable for use on desktops, servers, laptops, netbooks, mobile phones and tablets,[6][7] as well as minimal environments typically for use in embedded systems.[8][9] There are commercially backed distributions, such as Fedora (Red Hat), open. SUSE (SUSE) and Ubuntu (Canonical Ltd.), and entirely community- driven distributions, such as Debian, Slackware, Gentoo and Arch Linux. Most distributions come ready to use and pre- compiled for a specific instruction set, while some distributions (such as Gentoo) are distributed mostly in source code form and compiled locally during installation.[1. History[edit]. A timeline representing the development of various Linux distributions, including Android, as of 2. Linus Torvalds developed the Linux kernel and distributed its first version, 0. Linux was initially distributed as source code only, and later as a pair of downloadable floppy disk images – one bootable and containing the Linux kernel itself, and the other with a set of GNU utilities and tools for setting up a file system. Since the installation procedure was complicated, especially in the face of growing amounts of available software, distributions sprang up to simplify this.[1. Early distributions included the following: H. J. Lu's "Boot- root", the aforementioned disk image pair with the kernel and the absolute minimal tools to get started. MCC Interim Linux, which was made available to the public for download in February 1. Softlanding Linux System (SLS), released in 1. X Window System. Yggdrasil Linux/GNU/X, a commercial distribution first released in December 1. The two oldest and still active distribution projects started in 1. The SLS distribution was not well maintained, so in July 1. Slackware and based on SLS, was released by Patrick Volkerding.[1. Also dissatisfied with SLS, Ian Murdock set to create a free distribution by founding Debian, which had its first release in December 1. Users were attracted to Linux distributions as alternatives to the DOS and Microsoft Windows operating systems on IBM PC compatible computers, Mac OS on the Apple Macintosh, and proprietary versions of Unix. Most early adopters were familiar with Unix from work or school. They embraced Linux distributions for their low (if any) cost, and availability of the source code for most or all of the software included. Originally, the distributions were simply a convenience, offering a free alternative to proprietary versions of Unix but later they became the usual choice even for Unix or Linux experts.[citation needed]To date, Linux has become more popular in server and embedded devices markets than in the desktop market. For example, Linux is used on over 5. Components[edit]. A Linux distribution is usually built around a package management system, which puts together the Linux kernel, free and open- source software, and occasionally some proprietary software. Many Linux distributions provide an installation system akin to that provided with other modern operating systems. On the other hand, some distributions, including Gentoo Linux, provide only the binaries of a basic kernel, compilation tools, and an installer; the installer compiles all the requested software for the specific architecture of the user's computer, using these tools and the provided source code. Package management[edit]Distributions are normally segmented into packages. Each package contains a specific application or service. Examples of packages are a library for handling the PNG image format, a collection of fonts or a web browser. The package is typically provided as compiled code, with installation and removal of packages handled by a package management system (PMS) rather than a simple file archiver. Each package intended for such a PMS contains meta- information such as a package description, version, and "dependencies". The package management system can evaluate this meta- information to allow package searches, to perform an automatic upgrade to a newer version, to check that all dependencies of a package are fulfilled, and/or to fulfill them automatically. Although Linux distributions typically contain much more software than proprietary operating systems, it is normal for local administrators to also install software not included in the distribution. An example would be a newer version of a software application than that supplied with a distribution, or an alternative to that chosen by the distribution (for example, KDE Plasma Workspaces rather than GNOME or vice versa for the user interface layer). If the additional software is distributed in source- only form, this approach requires local compilation. However, if additional software is locally added, the "state" of the local system may fall out of synchronization with the state of the package manager's database. If so, the local administrator will be required to take additional measures to ensure the entire system is kept up to date. The package manager may no longer be able to do so automatically. Most distributions install packages, including the kernel and other core operating system components, in a predetermined configuration. Few now require or even permit configuration adjustments at first install time. This makes installation less daunting, particularly for new users, but is not always acceptable. For specific requirements, much software must be carefully configured to be useful, to work correctly with other software, or to be secure, and local administrators are often obliged to spend time reviewing and reconfiguring assorted software. Some distributions go to considerable lengths to specifically adjust and customize most or all of the software included in the distribution. Not all do so. Some distributions provide configuration tools to assist in this process. By replacing everything provided in a distribution, an administrator may reach a "distribution- less" state: everything was retrieved, compiled, configured, and installed locally. It is possible to build such a system from scratch, avoiding a distribution altogether. One needs a way to generate the first binaries until the system is self- hosting. This can be done via compilation on another system capable of building binaries for the intended target (possibly by cross- compilation). For example, see Linux From Scratch. Types and trends[edit]In broad terms, Linux distributions may be: Commercial or non- commercial.
![]() Electronic Dog Fence Recommendations#1 Overall System: Pet. Safe Yard. Max. For most installations we recommend the Pet. Safe Yard. Max. It is a tried and tested fence that has produced consistent good results for the last decade. The fence has a good mix of value and features. Red Brand 2 in. x 2 in. mesh fencing safeguards yards, gardens, toddlers and pets. The strong yet lightweight fence is an economical alternative to chain-link fencing. We use the Pet. Safe Yard. Max with most of our installation customers and it is by far the most popular system in our online store. What sets this system apart, is that it is the only wired fence that your dog cannot run through. It is also the only system that lets you set the boundary to extend only outside your yard (instead of both inside and outside) so it leave more space for your dog. The system has five levels of progressive correction, that self- adjust to take into account the persistence of the dog. We like the long- lasting rechargeable collar battery, and featherweight collar. The collars also have the unique feature of allowing you to tell whether they have been properly fitted. And the system is compatible with wireless indoor and outdoor pods so you can keep your dog out of certain rooms or a veggie garden. The Ultrasmart is best for dogs over 1. The weakness of the Ultrasmart is that it can only contain a maximum of 1. For a detailed review of the Pet. Safe Yard. Max, including pictures and a video review, click here. Remote Trainer: Innotek IUC- 5. For both remote training and dog fence functionality, the Innotek IUC- 5. The system includes an excellent dog fence, based on the Pet. Safe Ultrasmart. Plus, the system includes a remote control that can be used to control the correction on the collar from a range of up to 1. The collar includes a rechargeable lithium ion battery. And bundled with the system are the lighting protection module and twisted wire, both optional extras on most other system. For this versatility there are some tradeoffs. While the Innotek 5. The range on the collar is limited and for hunting or advanced training, a dedicated training collar would be a better choice. The collar is also bigger and bulkier than other leading systems. Acre Capacity: Sport. Dog SDF- 1. 00. AFor very large yards (over 1. Sport. Dog SDF- 1. The SDF- 1. 00 has a range of up to 1. The Sport. Dog is also useful for large yards in cold climates where the extra signal strength lets you power through accumulated snow. Built by the hunting dog company, Sport. Dog, this system is one of the toughest and most durable systems, with particularly excellent waterproofing. The system also comes with 1,0. The main drawback of this system is the collar is one of the biggest and heaviest wired dog fence collars. Small Dogs: Pet. Safe Little Dog. For small dogs, (under 1. Petsafe Little Dog is the way to go. The collars on regular dog fence systems are too big to be comfortable on a small dog. The Pet. Safe Little Dog has the smallest lightest collar, and reduced correction levels making it the best choice for very small dogs. The Pet. Safe Little Dog is also compatible with Pet. Safe Stubborn and Pet. Safe Deluxe in- ground dog fence collars. So you can use a full size, full strength collar such as the Pet. Safe Stubborn, or Pet. Safe Deluxe to contain other dogs using the same system. The main disadvantage of the Pet. Safe Little Dog is that it uses a proprietary Pet. Safe battery. The battery costs around $1. But, if your dog is less than 1. Wireless: Havahart Radial. For wireless or portable installations, the Havahart Radial- Shape Wireless is the best of the three wireless dog fence options. Wireless systems like the Havahart Wireless, Pet. Safe PIF- 3. 00, and Perimeter Technologies Wi. Fi project a circular boundary wirelessly and therefore do not require boundary wire. That makes these systems extremely convenient to set up. However, you do pay for that convenience with a relative drop in performance compared to the best in- ground wired systems. Wireless systems (particularly the Pet. Safe and Perimeter models) have trouble getting through physical barriers between them and the dog such as walls, trees, slopes, etc. The boundaries they create are also less precise and can move several feet second to second. They are also slow, often correcting the dog seconds too late and stopping the correction too late. This all makes them less effective than wire based systems. However, Havahart has recently introduced the newest wireless fence with the Havahart Radial- Shape Wireless Fence and it is clearly the best of the three when considering boundary consistency, timing of correction, and barrier pass- through. Of the two other wireless units, the older Pet. Safe Wireless is the second best with the Perimeter Wi. Fi fence coming in a distant third. Based on our field testing, the Havahart Wireless fence easily takes the top honors and should be your first choice when purchasing a wireless dog fence system. · Dengan K-Lite Codec Pack Anda harus dapat memainkan semua format audio populer dan video dan format kurang umum bahkan beberapa. The K-Lite Codec Pack.![]() K-Lite Codec Pack Full - полный набор, включающий кодеки, фильтры и компоненты стандартного набора. K-Lite Codec Pack Full - скачать K-Lite Codec Pack Full 13.5.0 бесплатно. K-Lite Codec Pack Full - Набор кодеков и. · · Download K-Lite Codec Pack 940 Full crack direct download link (click and install). K-Lite Mega Codec Pack was chosen as a Softpedia Pick. Softpedia also reported K-Lite Codec Pack 5.2 Full, K-Lite Codec Pack Full 5.2 Update. K-Lite Codec Pack — это пакет кодеков VFW/ACM, фильтров DirectShow и относящихся к ним. — K-Lite Codec Pack Full. ![]() Сайт Klitecodec.ru - скачай себе кодеки K-Lite Codec Pack бесплатно, с сайта или торрент для Windows 10, 8, 7, XP! Download links for the K-Lite Codec Pack. A free software bundle for high quality audio and video playback. K-Lite Codec Pack Basic variant, Download K-lite Codec Pack standard, Download K-Lite Codec Pack Full, K-Lite Codec Pack Mega, K-Lite Codec Pack Download. Скачать бесплатно K-Lite Codec Pack - K-Lite Codec Pack 13.50 (Full). K- Lite Codec Pack 1. Free Download. It offers support for 3. You will be amazed by the complexity and the configuration options of these applications starting with installation process, when you have the possibility to choose the settings for each and every codec. If you are a basic user, avoid the advanced mode and trust the program’s default options. In the end you will be able to play media files without any inconveniences. Whenever and wherever you need a complete codec, you can use K- Lite Codec Pack. Install it on your computer and also carry it around on your USB flash drive, as it is lightweight and reliable. Compared to other similar products, K- Lite Codec Pack are far superior due to a series of features and advantages. They always include the latest codec versions; they don’t contain any conflicting codecs; you are allowed to install only the components you need and not all the pack. The K- Lite Codec Pack Basic, as its name suggests, provides you with decoding solutions for the most common media formats. K- Lite Codec Pack Standard contains a bit more codecs for a wider variety of formats, while K- Lite Codec Pack Full offers you a complete solution for almost all formats and also allows you to perform you own encoding. Every new version of the K- Lite Codec Pack comes with improvements and updates. For the 1. 3 version, the updates are: MPC–HC to version 1. LAV Filters to version 0. Mad. VR to version 0. Media. Info Lite to version 0. Codec Tweak Tool to version 6. No matter what your needs are and what pack you choose – Basic, Standard or Full, K- Lite Codec Pack Full will function very smoothly and not slow down your system at all. IMPORTANT!- The K- Lite Codec Pack works only on Windows XP/2. Vista/7/8/1. 0. http: //www. K_Lite_Codec_Pack_2. Smart. Draft, Proge. EARTH Land Development Suite, Topo For Auto. Free autocad land desktop downloads - Collection of autocad land desktop freeware, shareware download - Copan Pro+DWG, Brava! Desktop Publishing Software for Html5. Download keygen autocad land desktop. land desktop 2009 keygen for 64bit. autocad land desktop 2010 free download serial crack. autocad lt 2007 crack. · Download Autocad Land Desktop 2009 Download. print, and track changes to 2D and 3D files. of Revit, AutoCAD, Inventor. the free AutoCAD LT upgrade. Autocad land desktop 2007 Free Download,Autocad land desktop 2007 Software Collection Download. Cad, .. Released: February 0. Visits: 4. 88. . . Civil Survey Autocad Clone Software, no learning curve for Autocad users, Natively reads and writes Autocad DWG files, no need for conversion! See also CAD Studio download (recently updated files in red). Autodesk - free; Viewers--AutoCAD mobile for Windows 10 tablets. (Land Desktop 1/2/2i/3.![]() Includes Data Colector File Import, COGO, Contours, DTM, Road.. License: Shareware | Price: $9. Size: 1. 8 MB | Downloads (2. EARTH Land Development Suite Download. Business Equipment: Buying vs. Leasing. Should your business lease or buy equipment? The answer depends on your situation. Leasing equipment can be a good option for business owners who have limited capital or who need equipment that must be upgraded every few years, while purchasing equipment can be a better option for established businesses or for equipment that has a long usable life. Each business is unique, however, and the decision to buy or lease business equipment must be made on a case- by- case basis. Here's a look at both options. Leasing Equipment. Leasing business equipment and tools preserves capital and provides flexibility but may cost you more in the long run. Advantages of Leasing Equipment. Less initial expense. The primary advantage of leasing business equipment is that it allows you to acquire assets with minimal initial expenditures. Because equipment leases rarely require a down payment, you can obtain the goods you need without significantly affecting your cash flow. Tax deductible. Lease payments can usually be deducted as business expenses on your tax return, reducing the net cost of your lease. Flexible terms. Leases are usually easier to obtain and have more flexible terms than loans for buying equipment. This can be a significant advantage if you have bad credit or need to negotiate a longer payment plan to lower your costs. Easier to upgrade equipment. Leasing allows businesses to address the problem of obsolescence. Section 179 of the tax code states that vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of over 6,000 pounds are eligible for an immediate business tax deduction. ![]() Increased section 179 deduction dollar limits. The maximum amount you can elect to deduct for most section 179 property you placed in service in 2009 is $250,000 ($.If you use your lease to obtain items that may be outdated in a short period of time, such as computers or other high- tech equipment, a lease passes the burden of obsolescence onto the lessor. You are free to lease new, higher- end equipment after your lease expires. Disadvantages of Leasing Equipment. Higher overall cost.
Leasing an item is almost always more expensive than purchasing it. For example, a 3- year lease on a computer worth $4,0. If you had bought it outright, you would have paid only $4,0. You don't own it. You don't build equity in the equipment. Unless the equipment has become obsolete by the end of the lease, this lack of ownership is a significant disadvantage. Obligation to pay for entire lease term. You are obligated to make payments for the entire lease period even if you stop using the equipment. Some leases give you the option to cancel the lease if your business changes direction and the equipment you leased is no longer necessary, but large early termination fees always apply. Buying Equipment. Ownership and tax breaks make buying business equipment appealing, but high initial costs mean this option isn't for everyone. Advantages of Buying Equipment. Ownership. The most obvious advantage of buying business equipment is that you gain ownership of it. This is especially true when the property has a long useful life and is not likely to become technologically outdated in the near future, such as office furniture or farm machinery. Tax incentives. Section 1. Internal Revenue Code allows you to fully deduct the cost of some newly purchased assets in the first year. In 2. 01. 2 and 2. For example, if you are in the 2. Possibility of depreciation deduction. Although not all equipment purchases are eligible for Section 1. Some assets that don't qualify for the Section 1. Disadvantages of Buying Equipment. Higher initial expense. For some people, purchasing business equipment may not be an option because the initial cash outlay is too high. Even if you plan to borrow the money and make monthly payments, most banks require a down payment of around 2. Borrowing money may also tie up lines of credit, and lenders may place restrictions on your future financial operations to ensure that you are able to repay your loan. Getting stuck with old equipment. Although ownership is perhaps the biggest advantage to buying business equipment, it can also be a disadvantage. If you purchase high- tech equipment, you run the risk that the equipment may become technologically obsolete, and you may be forced to reinvest in new equipment long before you had planned to. Certain business equipment has very little resale value. A computer system that costs $5,0. Should You Buy or Lease? When deciding whether to buy or lease a particular piece of business equipment, try to figure out the approximate net cost of that asset. Be sure to factor in tax breaks and resale value when making this calculation. After determining which option is more cost- effective, consider other intangibles such as the possibility that the product will become obsolete (if you are considering purchasing) or that your need for the product will expire before the lease does (if you are considering leasing). If you are considering a car lease, see Leasing a Car to learn about the advantages and disadvantages of car leasing. For all the practical and legal information you need for your small business, get the Legal Guide for Starting & Running a Small Business, by Fred S. Steingold (Nolo). Tesla Model X GVWR Is 6,7. Pounds. Tesla Model XSection 1. GVWR) of over 6,0. Basically, the deduction means that one doesn’t have to pay taxes on the $2. There’s been much speculation as to whether or not the Tesla Model X would qualify for this deduction. Turns out the Model X does have a GVWR of well over 6,0. Here’s the VIN to prove it: Model X VINFurther confirmation comes via Tesla spokesperson Alexis Georgeson who told Autoblog. Green the following: “Yes, the curb weight of Model X is 5,4. So we expect the GVWR to exceed 6,0. This means a Section 1. The vehicle must be used for transport by the business. Beyond that, the requirements/rules are as follows, according to the IRS: Sport Utility and Certain Other Vehicles. You cannot elect to expense more than $2. SUV) and certain other vehicles placed in service during the tax year. This rule applies to any 4- wheeled vehicle primarily designed or used to carry passengers over public streets, roads, or highways, that is rated at more than 6,0. However, the $2. 5,0. Designed to seat more than nine passengers behind the driver’s seat,Equipped with a cargo area (either open or enclosed by a cap) of at least six feet in interior length that is not readily accessible from the passenger compartment, or. That has an integral enclosure fully enclosing the driver compartment and load carrying device, does not have seating rearward of the driver’s seat, and has no body section protruding more than 3. ![]() Browse Nokia phones and find the perfect fit for you, with new smartphones coming in 2017. Nokia Lumia 1. 02. Wikipedia. Nokia Lumia 1. Front and rear sides of Nokia Lumia 1. MP camera. Brand. Nokia. Manufacturer. Nokia. Slogan. Nothing else comes close. Best Apps list for Nokia N8 and all Symbian Belle smartphones from all major sections. Free and Full version Direct Downloads with fast and easy access. Nokia recently released a new firmware update for its popular business phone, the Nokia E72. The new version 051.018 can be easily downloaded from Nokia. ![]() Series. Lumia. Compatible networks. GGSM/GPRS/EDGE – 8. MHz. 3GUMTS/DC- HSPA+ – 8. MHz. 4GLTE Rel. 8 (UE Cat 3) – 7. ![]() MHz. First released. July 2. 01. 3; 4 years ago (2. Availability by country. July 2. 01. 3; 4 years ago (2. United States)1. 5 August 2. China)September, 2. September 2. 01. 3; 4 years ago (2. Italy)1. 7 September 2. Australia)1. 9 September 2. Poland)2. 5 September 2. UK)2. 6 September 2. New Zealand)September 2. Belgium)September 2. Germany)October, 2. October 2. 01. 3; 3 years ago (2. France)3 October 2. Canada)1. 0 October 2. Denmark)1. 0 October 2. Norway)1. 1 October 2. India)1. 1 October 2. Russia)1. 1 October 2. Philippines)1. 7 October 2. Sweden)Discontinued. Predecessor. Nokia 8. Pure. View. Related. Nokia Lumia 9. 20. Nokia Lumia 9. 25. Nokia Lumia 9. 28. Type. Smartphone. Form factor. Bar. Dimensions. 13. 0. H7. 1. 4 mm (2. 8. W1. 0. 4 mm (0. 4. D1. 4. 5 mm (0. 5. Bulge. Weight. 15. Operating system. Windows Phone 8, upgradeable to 8. System on chip. Qualcomm. Snapdragon S4. CPU1. GHz dual- core. Qualcomm. Krait. GPUQualcomm. Adreno 2. 25. Memory. GB RAMStorage. 32 GB/6. GB internal flash. Battery. Rechargeable BV- 4. NW 2. 00. 0m. Ah Li- ion battery,Qi inductive charging (with wireless charging cover)Data inputs. Multi- touch capacitive touchscreen, gyroscope, magnetometer, proximity sensor, 3. D- accelerometer. Display. 4. 5" AMOLED RGBG Pen. Tile[1] Clear. Black capacitive touchscreen with Gorilla Glass 3,1. Rear camera. 41 Mpx (1/1. BSI sensor w/ Carl Zeiss optics,f/2. Optical image stabilization; Xenon flash,LED video light; RAW Image Capture (Adobe DNG); 1. Front camera. 1. 2 MP, 1. Connectivity. Other. Talk time: 2. G: 1. G: 1. 3. 3 hours. Standby: 6. 06 hours (about 2. Website. US: Nokia Lumia 1. UK: Nokia Lumia 1. The Nokia Lumia 1. Lumia 9. 09 during development[2]) is a smartphone developed by Nokia, first unveiled on 1. July 2. 01. 3 at a Nokia event at New York. It runs Windows Phone 8, but is also Windows Phone 8. It contains Nokia's Pure. View technology, a pixel oversampling (a data binning technique) that reduces an image taken at full resolution into a lower resolution picture, thus achieving higher definition and light sensitivity, and enables lossless zoom. It improves on Nokia's previous versions of Pure. View by coupling a new 4. BSI sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), and a high resolution f/2. Carl Zeiss lens. It is the successor of the Nokia 8. Pure. View and was considered to be the most advanced cameraphone when released in September 2. In January 2. 01. Nokia released the ‘Black’ firmware update for the Lumia 1. RAW (DNG) files.[9] The Lumia 1. Lumia Denim software update, but without new features or updates to the system firmware, due to the phone's age.[1. Pure. View Pro camera[edit]. Nokia Lumia 1. 02. PD- 9. 5G camera grip. Pure. View Pro is an imaging technology used in the Nokia 1. It is the combination of a 1/1. Carl Zeiss optics. The large sensor enables pixel oversampling, which means the combination of many sensor pixels into one image pixel. Pure. View imaging technology delivers high image quality, lossless zoom, and improved low light performance (see below). It dispenses with the usual scaling/interpolation model of digital zoom used in virtually all smartphones. In both video and stills, this technique provides greater zoom levels as the output picture size reduces, enabling 4× lossless zoom in full HD 1. HD. Optical image stabilization is also present to nullify shaking of hands when taking a photo and to allow significantly more light to enter the sensor for better low light photos. It also has an adjustable shutter speed of up to 1/1. Some reviewers have noted the camera may exhibit lens flare[1. It has a camera startup of 6. Pure. View Pro specifications[edit]Sensor. The Nokia Lumia 1. BSI CMOS image sensor, 1/1. Maximum image size at a 4: 3 aspect ratio is 7. Mpx); maximum image size at a 1. Mpx). Pixel size is 1. Sensor size is 8. Crop factor 3. 9. Compare. The Nokia 8. FSI CMOS image sensor, 1/1. Mpx. Depending on the aspect ratio chosen by the user, it will use 7. Mpx) for 1. 6: 9 images, or 7. Mpx) for 4: 3 images with the default camera app. Pixel size is 1. 4 µm. Sensor size is 1. Crop factor 3. 2×. Lens. Carl Zeiss optics with f/2. Focal length: 7. 2 mm: 3. Construction: Six elements in one group. All lens surfaces are aspherical, partly extreme aspheric, one high refractive index, low- dispersion glass mould lens. Optical image stabilisation — includes new type of barrel shift actuator, which enables moving a heavy and complex full- lens assembly. Shutter. Mechanical shutter with short shutter lag. Processing. On- chip image processor performing image scaling with oversampling, giving lossless zoom: 4× for full- HD 1. Nokia Pro Camera software[edit]The Lumia 1. Nokia's new Pro Camera application, allowing a greater degree of control over the camera settings than the standard Windows Phone in- built camera and can be set as the default imaging application when launched with the camera button. Providing "swipe- able" dials in a concentric ring display, settings such as exposure level, white balance, shutter speed and film ISO can be adjusted "on the fly" to enable changes to be visualised before a shot is taken. Nokia hope to bring professional camera settings, once the preserve of experts, to the masses and encourage experimentation and learning using built- in tutorials. Model variants[edit]Model. RM- 8. 75. RM- 8. RM- 8. 77. Countries. International. TBAUnited States, Canada. Carriers/Providers. International. TBAAT& T, Rogers Wireless. GQuad- band GSM/EDGE (8. MHz)3. GQuad- band HSPA+ 1, 2, 5/6, 8(8. MHz)Pentaband HSPA+ 1, 2, 4, 5/6, 8(8. AWS/1. 90. 0/2. MHz)AT& T: Quad- band HSPA+ 1, 2, 5/6, 8(8. MHz)Rogers: Pentaband HSPA+ 1, 2, 4, 5/6, 8(8. AWS/1. 90. 0/2. MHz)4. GPentaband LTE 1, 3, 7, 8, 2. MHz)No. Quad- band LTE 2, 4, 5, 1. MHz)Max network speed down/upload. LTE: 1. 00/5. 0 Mbit/s. DC- HSPA+: 4. 2. 2/5. Mbit/s. HSPA+: 2. Mbit/s. LTE: 1. 00/5. Mbit/s. DC- HSPA+: 4. Mbit/s. Reception[edit]. Front of a Lumia 1. Windows Phone tiles on the screen. Reception was mainly positive, but some reviewers noted that the market for the Lumia 1. Kamalahasan from Know. Your. Gadget stated: "Nokia Lumia 1. Nokia 8. 08. The camera is just superb and one of the best we have seen on a mobile device. If you need a simple smartphone and your phone doubles as your point and shoot, this is the device for you.[1. Brian Klug from Anandtech stated: "I think it’s fair to say that once again Nokia has basically set the bar for the rest of the smartphone imaging world – in terms of both hardware and software features."[1. Chris Finnamore from Expert Reviews wrote: "Simply stunning photos make the Lumia 1. He gave it five stars and awarded it the Expert Reviews: Ultimate award, which places it among other high- end flagships such as the Galaxy S4 and the i. Phone 5. S, which also received the award.[2. Erin Lodi of Digital Photography Review wrote: "Despite the lower lighting level, the Nokia is able to out- perform its rivals by a healthy margin. Fine detail is better maintained and the image is generally "cleaner." This benefit (that comes from a combination of a larger sensor and the noise- reducing effect of downscaling images), is one of the significant advantages of Nokia's decision to use a large sensor in a smartphone. Whether you look at the resolution stripe on the left of the image or the etched portrait on the right, the 1. David Pierce from The Verge said that this is a remarkable phone, hampered by its operating system.[2. Dan Nosowitz from Popular Science wrote: "Nokia's new Lumia smartphone has amazing hardware (especially its unprecedented 4. And it doesn't matter at all, because its software lags so far behind its hardware."[2. Charles Arthur from The Guardian wrote: "The Finnish phone maker released its remarkable Lumia 1. Instagram, Vine and Snapchat"[2. Jim Fisher and Sascha Segan from PC Magazine wrote: "The Lumia 1. Nokia's sensor and lens advances must be paired with a CPU and image processor fast enough to make shooting effortless, and Windows Phone's creative app gaps need to be filled in."[2. G van Veldhoven from Gadgetmania wrote: "If you absolutely need the best camera on a smartphone and don’t mind Windows Phone 8 and spending a good chunk of money upfront, the Lumia 1. I don’t expect it to be very popular."[2. ![]() Nine People Shot Dead At NFL Watch Party; Victim's Mom Says Daughter's Ex- Husband Was The Shooter. Nine people are dead, including the suspected gunman, and a 1. NFL watch party over the weekend in Plano, Texas, according to local police. The suspect, who was killed by the responding officer, hasn’t been identified by authorities, but the mother of one victim told a Dallas TV station that the shooter was her daughter’s ex- husband. Plano police chief Greg Rushin said the gunman shot nine people; seven died at the scene, Rushin said. Two more were alive and taken to a local hospital, where one of them died. The condition of the remaining survivor wasn’t known by police on Monday afternoon. They also did not release any names of the victims, saying they were still reaching out to next of kin. Debbie Lane told WFAA- TV that one of the victims was her daughter, Meredith, an Atlanta native and cook who “loved hosting friends and family.” That day, Debbie Lane said, her daughter had a watch party for the Atlanta Falcons game, followed by the Cowboys taking on the New York Giants in the Sunday Night Football matchup. ![]() ![]() Man at the neo-Nazi protest in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 12, 2017, shooting near a crowd of counter protesters and then continuing to march (GIF from video. The classic US stereotype of attempted Iranian ideological indoctrination via chants of “Death to America” and such has been old hat for quite some time. As noted. It’s Monday, which makes it a good day to channel your inner current-gen Mazda Miata: smiling on the outside, yet ready to give somebody a hardcore evil eye at any. The Imperial Stormtrooper Marksmanship Academy trope as used in popular culture. When only the Bad Guys suffer from A-Team Firing. Also called the Principle. Her father, Gene Lane, told the Washington Post, “All we know is that she’s gone.”Court records obtained by the Dallas Morning News showed that Lane had been married to Spencer Hight, but they stopped living together in March of this year. She filed for divorce in July, those records showed, with “discord or conflict of personalities” cited as the reason, per the Morning News. A neighbor at a listed address for Hight said police had already visited the apartment. Rushin would not confirm the shooter’s identity or that it was a domestic- violence homicide, but he used many of the key words that typically come up in such an investigation. Rushin said the shooter had a “relationship” with the house, had “ties to that residence,” and “he was known by the people in the residence.” Rushin later described what happened as “an isolated incident,” and said police were not looking for any other suspects. Rushin at one point mentioned that “family violence” can happen anywhere. At the same press conference, Rushin also went into more details about what happened. He said police were responding Sunday night to a call of shots fired. The first officer at the scene saw people shot in the backyard, and decided he couldn’t wait for backup.“The first thing he heard was shots being fired. He saw people in the backyard that were down, that were shot. So he instantly knew what was going on. He went into the house on his own,” Rushin said. He made that decision that he couldn’t wait for backup, for another partner, to go in as we were trained and go in to stop the shooter. And that’s exactly what he did. He actually found the shooter inside and ended his shooting spree.” One witness described to WFAA’s David Goins the fighting she heard right before the shots were fired. While Plano police are investigating the homicide, the Texas Rangers will investigate the police officer’s shooting of the suspect. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |